An easy glance at my personal record on this web site will attest to the fact i am a huge follower of relationship studies. I’m fascinated by the techniques we you will need to apply technology to gender and really love, hoping of just one time being able to give an explanation for mystical ways of the heart.

Some studies offer interesting insight into modern mating rituals, however, many (if you don’t the majority of) are, as TruTv.com creator Nick Nadel puts it, “forehead-slappingly evident.” Nadel collected a list of 10 studies that many certainly belong to the second category. Below are a few regarding the highlights:

Dubious research # 1: scientists at Radboud college of Nijmegen in The Netherlands unearthed that men tend to have difficulty performing cognitive activities after interacting chat with lesbians members of the contrary intercourse. To put it differently, Nadel states, “interacting with women can make guys foolish.”

Nadel’s Take: “As obvious scientific studies get, this option is up there with ‘people sometimes bend reality online.'” It shouldn’t simply take a research staff to figure out that men’s minds get distracted around females.

My personal views: i need to side with Nadel about one. It willn’t come as a surprise that men’s brains get somewhat addled around appealing women, and that I guess that a research on women’s brains would realize that they’ve been just as addled around appealing men.

Questionable Study no. 2: According to research by the results of one of OkCupid’s many studies in the OkTrends weblog, individuals who make use of Twitter daily have quicker interactions than others that do maybe not.

Nadel’s Take: OkCupid doesn’t even think their unique conclusions. a representative for the website stated “regrettably, we no chance to share with that’s dumping who here; if the Twitterati are more annoying or maybe just more flighty than everyone else.” Put another way, there’s no real evidence that Twitter features almost anything to carry out using period of a relationship.

My personal mind: In the event the individuals accountable for the research are not even sure what their unique results are, they truly are not likely worth paying a lot awareness of. The OkTrends studies are a lot of fun, but are in no way the conclusive term on things online dating.

Questionable Study number 3: The length of a man’s ring finger is related to their attractiveness, relating to a group within University of Geneva in Switzerland. The ratio that compares the duration of a man’s list little finger to their ring-finger is known as “2D:4D.”

Nadel’s simply take: the analysis claims that guys with extended ring fingers have actually “rugged, caveman-like” faces. “Right,” Nadel claims, “because ladies always decide on the caveman look. It is not like a number of the most well known male a-listers are non-threatening, baby-faced kinds or any such thing.”

My personal Thoughts: many respected reports examining female belief of male attractiveness discovered that ladies are attracted to different sorts of men during different phases of the monthly period cycles. A female could, thus, be thinking about the “baby-faced types” in addition to “rugged cavemen” over the course of per month. And also as far as the fingers get, “relationship isn’t causation” – though there might be a link between digit size and elegance, one doesn’t necessarily result in the some other.

Stay tuned for lots more frivolous results and absurd scientific studies from Nick Nadel and TruTV…